LightBlog

lundi 27 juillet 2015

New Samsung Monitor Will Charge Your Phone Wirelessly

M3_Main

Wireless charging is certainly a technology of the future, having tremendous scope to make our lives a tad bit more convenient.

And that is the aim of Samsung’s newly launched SE370 Monitor, as it claims to be the world’s first monitor with an integrated wireless charger for smartphones. The monitor will work with all devices that support the Qi wireless charging standard.

Apart from the integrated wireless charger, the Samsung SE370 has a fairly standard setup as far as being a monitor is concerned. The monitor comes in two sizes, 23.6″ and 27″, both maintaining a 16:9 aspect ratio and a 1920 x 1080 resolution. The panel used is of Samsung-developed PLS technology, which is claimed to have better viewing angles as well as be brighter than conventional IPS displays. The monitor claims a response time of 4ms with viewing angles being claimed to be 178°. It also supports AMD’s FreeSync technology to minimize input latency by synchronizing the screen refresh rate with the frame rate of the computer’s graphics card (AMD only). Design wise, the SE370 aims to give a clean look and does succeed at it, like a lot of other monitors do.

M1_Main M2_Main

All in all, the standout selling feature of the SE370 Monitors will be the integrated wireless charger. The monitor will easily complement an office environment all the while enabling the user to declutter his desk from unnecessary wires. The charging pad is built in a convenient and easy to reach spot in the middle of the T-stand, thanks to which you can still use the monitor efficiently as well as keep an eye on your phone’s screen.

Currently, there is no word on the availability and pricing of this monitor, but we can safely guess that the product will not be placed in the entry-level category.

Nonetheless, it is good to see products that help push the rate of adoption of newer technologies. Products like these, which tend to complement smartphones and help drive the popularity of technologies which possess great potential. While wireless chargers may not be able to compete against traditional cable based chargers solely on charging speeds, the convenience they provide can not be ignored. However, the decision of whether one should purchase a whole new monitor to have a wireless charger on their desk may depend more on the buyer’s purchasing power and the need for remaining wire-free. And it’s only a matter of time until we see a Kickstarter campaign for a universal T-stand for monitors with an integrated wireless charger for smartphones.

What are your thoughts on the Samsung SE370 monitor? Would you consider spending more money for the convenience this monitor provides, as opposed to a traditional monitor? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!

from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1MROD3W
via IFTTT

Security Vulnerability Found in Majority of Android Phones

Zimerium-s-Advisory-Board-Welcomes-Kevin-Mitnick-2

Security firm Zimperium has announced that it has discovered a vulnerability in Android versions 2.2 – 5.1, independent of Google Play Services. Specifics won’t be published until August, but it is claimed that a hacker could use a video within a Hangouts MMS to access the target phone without the user being aware.



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1Owlagq
via IFTTT

LG G4 Variants Rooted! OnePlus 2 Invites Open! – XDA TV

Jordan

The LG G4 Carrier Variants have been rooted! That and much more news is covered by Jordan when he reviews all the important stories from this week. Included in this week’s news is the announcement of the opening of the OnePlus 2 invite queue and be sure to check out the article talking about the rooting of the Dell Venue 8 7840. That’s not all that’s covered in today’s video!

Jordan talks about the other videos released this week on XDA TV. XDA TV Producer TK released an Xposed Tuesday video covering Action Widgets. Then TK held a showdown between Hound and Google Now. Also, TK gave us an app review of Boldbeast. Pull up a chair and check out this video.

Be sure to check out other great XDA TV Videos

Check out Jordan’s YouTube Channel and Jordan’s Gaming YouTube Channel



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1gfBS9h
via IFTTT

dimanche 26 juillet 2015

Smooth Your ZenFone 2 with CyanogenMod 12.1

20150726233359604

The ZenFone 2 now has a CyanogenMod 12.1 ROM that serves as a much needed trim to the user experience of stock ZenUI. XDA Senior Member ansebovi has provided a step-by-step guide for getting it running on your device from scratch. In case you haven’t, be sure to check out our impressions first!



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1HTrayj
via IFTTT

TWRP Recovery 2.8.7.0 Released for T-Mobile LG G4

TWRP-Recovery-img-for-Galaxy-S-Plus-I9001-400x250

Hot on the heels of the recent LG G4 carrier root method, TWRP 2.8.7.0 has been released for the T-Mobile LG G4 (H811). You’ll need root and an unlocked bootloader to proceed. Happy flashing!



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1Jo5yw7
via IFTTT

Sunday Debate: Software vs. Hardware Keys

keybattle

Join us in a fun Sunday Debate on navigation keys. Come with your opinions and feel free to read some of our thoughts, then pick your side or play devil’s advocate to get your voice heard and engage in friendly discussion. You can read our food-for-thought or jump straight into the fray below!

 

 

 

Touchscreens have the virtue of being able to represent all sorts of buttons and prompts on a screen, making for interactive and dynamic interfaces. But since Android’s inception, a few key functions have remained at the bottom of our devices. Many have come and gone, and new ones have showed up. But Android devices still ship with keys, be them the old hardware keys or the new on-screen buttons. Both have gathered preference from users, but manufacturers seem to be opting for the software variants more and more.

 

Hardware keys are still prevalent, though, and some of the most popular devices still feature them. The Galaxy S6 and the OnePlus One, for example, have keys outside of screen real-state. The Nexus line brought and popularized software keys, though, and this one is also one of the most popular lines among these circles. Love them or hate them, both options have had key roles in shaping the OS and both feature strengths and weaknesses.

 

In this debate we want to explore what you think are the best and worst things about both solutions, and whether one should claim complete supremacy over the other for the future of the platform. While much of this falls into personal taste, we urge you to look at their traits objectively to determine which one is the one to go for, or to reasonably justify your preference. Feel free to skip our food-for-thought if you feel confident on your stance; we ask: what are the strengths and weaknesses of each option? Which option is best for the platform? Why do you personally prefer one over the other? What can be done to improve each solution? Which types of devices are better off with or without a particular type of keys, and why?

 

Software / On-Screen Keys

 

20150726171623168One of the main reasons software keys are preferred by many is their reliability: since the buttons are tied to the software and the touchscreen, one does not have to worry about a home-button becoming flimsy or unusable. Reducing mechanical components and internal hardware can result in benefits for phone makers and users alike, and ultimately, it can allow for sleeker and more compact designs and profiles. The bezel benefits do have a limit, though, as some chin is needed for a good grip that doesn’t sacrifice usability. That being said, the benefits of software keys go well beyond reliability and costs:

 

Their flexibility allows for one to have greater control over key navigation options. Not only can you hide the buttons if you so desire, but you can also customize them on many ROMs from both OEMs and our developers. This means that you can switch the buttons around and their labels, avoiding confusion. You can also add or remove buttons, allowing for other options such as menu and other triggers to be right on your screen at all times. Software buttons can also flip their orientation and adapt to different themes, as well as change depending on the context (for example, when a keyboard is up). All of this makes software buttons a lot more open than the hardware solution.

 

Hardware / Physical & Capacitive Keys

 

20150726171944630The OG of all phone input, this solution still lives today despite the push for software keys in Android. While many feel hardware keys are antiquated and unreliable, they do offer some benefits in terms of physical design. For one, hardware keys give OEMs the option to utilize the bottom bezel and leave less space unused in the phone’s front. The home button’s middle placement can also act as a fingerprint scanner, as seen in Samsung phones and as we can expect in the OnePlus Two. Depending on how they are executed, hardware buttons can have static labels that render the keys unintuitive if one chooses to switch up functions. However, one can indeed switch functions around through various methods, allowing for certain degrees of flexibility.

 

But the other side of the hardware keys’ flexibility is the fact that one can still have software buttons on these phones, and one can also disable the hardware keys as well. This allows phones like the Galaxy Note 4 to opt for the hardware keys or the software keys in custom ROMs or through alternative software modifications. More over, one can even mod different functions while having both types of keys to allow for more options in less space, or disable certain keys and not others. It is another dimension of flexibility that is still quite useful in itself. Finally, some users prefer the tactile feedback of physical buttons, or how they are incorporated into the design of the phone. Phones like the OnePlus One allow you to opt for whatever solution you decide, and in that phone’s case, for example, the hardware keys do not hold anything back as they are subtle and unobtrusive.

 

Debating

 

One one hand, software keys are flexible and allow for all sorts of inventive features and customization. They are also cheaper to produce, can save space and can be considered more reliable than hardware counterparts. On the other hand, hardware keys make better use of the space in the bottom chin if there is one, they allow for better tactile feedback, can incorporate different sensors and, in some cases or with some modifications, can be toggled off to allow for software keys as well. The latter can offer the best of both worlds, and in some cases (like with the OPO) without significantly sacrificing aesthetics due to hidden capacitive keys. So once again, we ask:

 

  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of each option?
  • Which option is best for the platform?
  • Why do you personally prefer one over the other?
  • What can be done to improve each solution?
  • Which types of devices are better off with or without a particular type of keys, and why?


from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1D3C19T
via IFTTT

samedi 25 juillet 2015

1080p Recording With OnePlus One Front-Facing Camera

20150725193318204

The OnePlus Two is getting unveiled on Monday, but its predecessor just keeps getting better. XDA Recognized Developer Sultanxda has an excellent ROM that is now the only one out there that supports 1080p video recording for the front-facing camera. The OnePlus One really doesn’t settle!



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1Jmeoud
via IFTTT