LightBlog

dimanche 21 juin 2015

Sunday Debate: Who Will Take The Chipset Crown?

20150620234054424

Join us in a fun Sunday Debate on Chipsets. Come with your opinions and feel free to read some of our thoughts, then pick your side or play devil’s advocate to get your voice heard and engage in friendly discussion. You can read our food-for-thought or jump straight into the fray below!

 

 

As power users, processors are a big deal to us. Readers of our XDA Portal have probably noticed that performance is a topic we address weekly, be it through new system optimizations or discussing the latest developments in hardware. This year, chipsets haven’t had the best track record — at least not for all parties. While Samsung did see a particularly good release with their S6 and its powerful Exynos, Qualcomm’s monopoly over flagship phones burned out with their Snapdragon 810 processor. Other companies like MediaTek still haven’t caught up, and Huawei’s Kirin CPU did not impress nearly as much as we expected.

 

With Qualcomm having lost reputation and influence over the flagship game, it might be time for another manufacturer to break into the premium offerings of most OEMs. While the Snapdragon line has served us right for years – and can continue to do so with their upcoming SD820 and its revisioned design – many power users agree that there needs to be a change, if only for variety’s and competition’s sake. With so many players stepping up their game and holding promising developments, the future of our phones’ silicon brains are uncertain, and watching the competition scale up and battle it out will certainly be interesting.

 

So our questions to you are: what do you want to see in upcoming chipsets, and who do you want to improve? Do you believe current underdogs will climb up the ladder? Do you think Qualcomm will redeem itself soon? Which manufacturer’s developments are you looking forward to the most? Who do you want to build your next phone’s chip? Feel free to read some of our thoughts on each company to get some context and kick-start your thoughts, but you can jump straight to the comments if you want!

 

Notable Players:

 

  • Qualcomm: The company that made some of the best and most beloved processors in Android history (such as the timeless Snapdragon 800) is now in quite a struggle due to its disappointing Snapdragon 810. We all know about this, and while the revised iterations don’t show much promise, its upcoming Snapdragon 820 will bring back Qualcomm’s custom CPU designs with Kyro, the successor to the 800 line’s traditional Krait Cores. This and the significant advances in the Adreno GPU line (which didn’t slow down much in the 810) raise our hopes of a comeback.

 

  • Samsung: The Exynos 7 line Samsung touted so much delivered in the S6 and S6 Edge, which boasted the best synthetic benchmark outputs of any phone released at its time. Only Nvidia’s SoCs can compete, but these cannot be reasonably incorporated into phones. With promises of better performance, reports of “Mongoose” custom cores and a new long-term deal with ARM for the best Mali GPUs, we can expect great things. And when you factor in Samsung’s increasingly shrinking processes and ridiculous investments in fabrication methods and factories, things look even better. Will they sell these to other OEMs, though?

 

  • Intel: Intel’s new developments in the mobile space are quite remarkable: from having little to no presence in mobile consumer minds, Intel managed to put its name out there with the ZenFone 2, which featured excellent performance for its pricepoint. With promises of shrinked processes, the next-generation Cherry Trail Atom CPUs and the ongoing indirect optimization of x86 on Android (through ART lessening the need for platform-specific code), Intel might have quite a trick (or performance) up its sleeve for us soon.

 

  • HiSilicon: Huawei’s chipmaking division might not be the most known nor renowned one out there, but they are scaling up to try and compete in this increasingly fierce space. Huawei is a company that focuses heavily on R&D, with 46% of their employees being allocated in that department, and their year-to-year growth makes them a solid competitor. Their latest Kirin 930 CPU found in their P8 flagship was admittedly underwhelming, but Qualcomm had a rough transition to big.LITTLE 64-bit architectures as well, and Huawei can bring up its game through sheer investments and formidable R&D resources alone.

 

  • Nvidia: Nvidia’s latest chips are not meant for smartphones, but nonetheless they offer tremendous performance. As far as theoretical maximums go, their Tegra K1 and X1 line of SoC’s are at the front of benchmark outputs. They consistently break benchmark records, although their real-world performance (as seen in the Nexus 9) is not quite what the numbers would suggest and putting these on phones would be impractical due to heat and battery drain. Could Nvidia surprise us with a worthy smartphone chip?

 

Debating

 

There are other chipset companies that we did not mention, so feel free to bring them up. All of these chipmakers can surprise us in the future, and now that Qualcomm lost its leading reputation, it might lose its position on future flagships. We can expect all of these companies to ramp up their efforts to have a shot at the crown — all of them have tremendous amounts of resources, and most get their fair share of revenue from other areas (outside of mobile processors) as well. Keeping an open mind, we ask you:

 

 

  • Which chip makers do you think will surprise us in the near future?
  • Will any of them take Qualcomm’s crown, or will Snapdragons remain in most phones?
  • Which do you think will put out the best performing chip, and what do you base your predictions on?
  • Which company do you personally want in charge of your next chipset?

 

The post Sunday Debate: Who Will Take The Chipset Crown? appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1GfrxQI
via IFTTT

Melior UI Theme

image

Over 30 themed applications, custom wallpapers, fonts and audio files are just a few elements included in the Melior UI theme made by XDA Senior Member jahirfiquitiva. Give it a try if you’re looking for a minimalist theme for CyanogenMod 12 or other ROMs with theme engine.

The post Melior UI Theme appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1K4307k
via IFTTT

[Theme][CM 12.x] Asteroid

Main

Looking for an interesting new theme for your device? Check out this new Space theme made by XDA Senior Member PunchUp called Asteroid, It covers every element of the UI and works fine with CyanogenMod 12.0 or 12.1.

The post [Theme][CM 12.x] Asteroid appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1Gt61ak
via IFTTT

HTC One M9 Discontinued by A Canadian Carrier

maxresdefault

HTC’s One M9 is a great device but sales fall short of estimates. One of the Canadian carriers even decided to discontinue selling the device due to lackluster demand. It’s one of the first instances we’ve seen where a device from such a well known OEM is discontinued due to poor marketing results.

The post HTC One M9 Discontinued by A Canadian Carrier appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1Gt63ip
via IFTTT

Panasonic Lumix CM1 Android Camera Launches in US

Panasonic-Lumix-CM1

A device that first premiered almost a year ago is finally available to pre-order. It features a 4.7-inch Full HD screen, a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 processor and 2GB of RAM, allowing this camera to record 4K Ultra HD videos albeit in 15 FPS and full HD video at 30 FPS. Read more about it in the article.

The post Panasonic Lumix CM1 Android Camera Launches in US appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1eA8x8U
via IFTTT

samedi 20 juin 2015

Do You Use Your Phone’s Speakers to Listen to Music?

BoomSound_Blog

A few smartphone makers, specifically HTC, have spent a lot of time and focus on improving the quality of speakers on their devices. Boomsound is touted as being miles ahead of the competition when it comes to quality of sound, but just how often do you listen to music on your smartphone’s speakers? Let us know your thoughts down below.

The post Do You Use Your Phone’s Speakers to Listen to Music? appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1FtvEH3
via IFTTT

Moto 360 5.1.1 Forced OTA & Performance Impressions

20150619_165819-01~01~01

Those of you who follow my Wear posts will know that I am often in a bittersweet relationship with my watches. I love the additional functionality, but at the same time, I see plenty of wasted potential. Since acquiring my Moto 360, my thoughts on the platform have changed for the better, but not my actual user experience. The 5.1.1 update brings back some of the hope I had lost.

 

We must keep in mind a key fact: the Moto 360 has an old TI OMAP 3 processor, which is not only power-hungry but also causes stuttering in general UI operations. While performance has been increased throughout the Wear software revisions, it still paled in comparison to devices featuring the Snapdragon 400; having a Gear Live, I can attest to the performance of the 360 having been much inferior. The 5.1.1 update was delayed and came much later than it did for other watches, presumably because of this very processor, as Motorola claimed that they needed extra optimization. I forced the OTA (steps below – at the XDA office we tried it on 3 different 360s) and tried out the latest update.

 

How we forced the OTA:

  1. Make sure phone and watch are connected
  2. Reset watch, and as it boots up into the Motorola logo (the first time) unpair your watch through bluetooth settings
  3. As your device resets, go to your Wear app, “forget” your watch, delete data and cache, then uninstall the Wear app
  4. Reinstall the app (if your Moto 360 is remembered, something went wrong) and set up your watch again once it hits the language selection screen
  5. Head to the System Update menu – the update should begin downloading!

 

After letting the watch rest post-setup, I began playing with the new software and immediately noticed something: the watch is now much smoother. In fact, it performs similarly to my Gear Live running 5.1.1. There are still a few frame skips every now and then, but overall they are much shorter and infrequent stutters than previous versions. One thing to note is that wrist gestures and wifi come toggled off by default, as does ambient mode. Once you turn those features on, you can enjoy them.


 

Another thing I noticed is that the wake-up gesture seems slightly faster, and this coupled with wrist gestures makes notification peeping much more efficient than ever. The gestures work really well, and while they are somewhat confusing at first, after half a day of usage I can trigger them to perfection. I had tried these on the Gear Live and they remain just as solid. If you are a Moto 360 owner, I cannot overstate how good these gestures are for the user experience, so be sure to turn them on. Wear should have had these from the get-go.

wear1 wearui2 wearui5

 

The user interface is not only refined in terms of performance, but also in terms of aesthetics. Much like with the other watches, this interface looks sleeker than it ever did. However, one thing worth noting is that the bottom cut-off of the notification drawer present in the latest version actually benefits the 360, as it matches up with the “flat tire” perfectly. Apps still don’t fire up as faster as I would like them to, but the new launcher makes them easy to access without needing third-party launchers.

 

The ability to have dimmed-mode apps does not work as well as it does in other watches here, as the Moto 360’s dimmed state is not always-on. Wi-fi works as it should, and this has proven extremely useful as well. The screen-lock function is thoughtful, albeit I personally won’t be using it. I can’t comment on battery life yet, however, as my usage throughout the past day has been filled with atypical usage that would make my results yield no practical information (I’ve been using the fleshed-out Maps quite a bit, as it’s great).

wearui4 wearui3 maps

 

All in all, I am satisfied with the performance bump and feature-set of this latest update. I can’t say it was worth the wait until I see how the battery performs under traditional scenarios. If you have a Moto 360, feel free to try out the method detailed above. I can’t state with absolutely certainty that it will work for you, but it worked like clockwork for 3 of our devices. I commend Moto for finding a way to tune the performance to this level, and I am now enjoying Wear more than ever. And with recent reports suggesting that the battery bug present in other watches’ 5.1.1 builds was fixed for this 360 update, the watch just gained a lot more love from me as well.

 

 

Have you tried 5.1.1 on your Wear smartwatch? What do you think about it so far? Sound off below!

The post Moto 360 5.1.1 Forced OTA & Performance Impressions appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers http://ift.tt/1H5tIff
via IFTTT