LightBlog

samedi 21 novembre 2015

iDea Pico Review – A Pocket Projector Packing a Powerful Punch

Untitled design (1)

Every so often a gadget comes along that fits so well into my life that a few days after purchasing it I feel like I have been using it for years, that is where the iDea Pico comes in, an LED projector that combines an exceptional build quality with, a tiny form factor and an incredible high definition display. The concept is simple, a projector that can connect to almost any device wirelessly and project the desired content in glorious 1080p onto any surface. Place it on your desk and it can easily replace your monitor, place it in your lounge and depending on the wall space available you now have an obscenely large TV. In my test we set the projector up on a coffee table and spent the evening watching Breaking Bad at around 120 inches.

Check out the official promo below:

The unit arrived with every accessory you could need for such a device, it comes in a hard shell travel case, lined on the outside with fabric and containing an insert made of a firm but soft foam. inside the case is a car adapter with two USB ports so you do not have to forgo charging your phone or sat nav as well. Also included is a small remote for navigating the projectors interface, a fully adjustable tripod and a charger.

IMG_20151121_203310
IMG_20151121_203459 

Connecting and using the projector could not be easier, turning it on brings up a menu with options for Android, Windows, iOS, OS X, DLNA, WiFi and microSD meaning the vast majority of devices can connect in some manner. To connect the Pico to the internet you have two options, the first is via the projector’s settings menu using the d-pad to enter your password, alternatively you can connect to the projector’s built-in hotspot and navigate to http://192.168.49.1/ on your device and connect there, as soon as you are online you can begin watching.

iDea Pico

While the official specifications state that you can expect 4 hours battery life out of the device I imagine that this is based on perfect conditions, I found that by connecting via Androids native display casting the 5000mAh battery managed around three and a half hours before having to connect it to a power supply via micro USB.

The internal speaker is better than any you are likely to find on a phone and will certainly suffice when out and about however if this is something you will be using as your primary TV you will be wanting some external speakers which can be connected via the 3.5mm port at the rear of the unit. The Pico does have an internal fan to aid with cooling however, its noise is almost imperceptible and entirely so when audio is playing from the device.

 

IMG_20151121_202533 IMG_20151121_202343 IMG_20151121_202434 IMG_20151121_202505

Use cases

  • Gaming – Android games have never looked so good! You think Asphalt had some impressive graphics before, wait till you see them take up an entire wall!
  • Movies & TV – Tilt the projector straight up, lay back in bed and finally get started on that Netflix marathon you’ve been planning.
  • Google Glass – A proud owner of Glass? Using screencast you can share what you see with the world on a bigger screen than ever before.
  • Public speaking – Boot up Power Point or Google Slides and there you have it, a presentation on demand.
  • Music Videos – At a party? Liven it up with the videos to your favourite tunes.
IMG_20151121_201844 IMG_20151121_201939 IMG_20151121_202037 IMG_20151121_202308

The micro SD allows for the playback of the following formats:
Video format: AVI/MOV/VOB/MPEG/MPG/RM/RMVB/MKV/WMV
Audio format: MP3/WMA/WAV
Image format: JPG/PNG

This is well worth more than a second glance, it is a superb product and adds some great potential to Android as well as your computer, it has become a permanent fixture in my home and I wouldn’t be surprised if it made its way on to many Christmas lists this year.

Find it on Amazon
Have you used a projector with Android before? Leave a comment below!



from xda-developers » xda-developers | iDea Pico Review – A Pocket Projector Packing a Powerful Punch http://ift.tt/1SRrIIF
via IFTTT

Sony Adds Theme Engine To its Marshmallow Concept

Screen-Shot-2015-10-02-at-11.15.33-3c531a30f68519041df6595c03bcc5a7

A new version of the Android Marshmallow Concept firmware has been released by Sony Mobile for the Xperia Z3 and Z3 Compact, bringing the highly anticipated Xperia Theme support. Apart from that, there are many stability fixes and improvements. Look for the OTA if you have signed up for the program. Follow the link for more information!



from xda-developers » xda-developers | Sony Adds Theme Engine To its Marshmallow Concept http://ift.tt/1T6HO1X
via IFTTT

Snapchat Is at It Again and Blocks Root Users — but for How Long?

snap

Despite many security concerns from the past, Snapchat is still one of the most popular social media service available for smartphones. According to reports, it has 100 million of active users, and 65% of them upload photos.

Snapchat users would easily become the 13th biggest country in the world if we take population as a measure.

Snapchat’s fast way of sharing photos to multiple friends at the time is highly regarded by users. However, many of you, Snapchat users will soon face, if not already, a serious inconvenience, as Snapchat will stop working on your devices. Yes, Snapchat will not work on rooted devices.

The newest update brings a new security check. The application is now looking for superuser existence in the system upon logging in. A nice explanation of the problem was made by XDA Senior Member MaaarZ, who is also a creator of Snapprefs, an Xposed Framework module which enhances the limited Snapchat’s utility. According to MaaarZ, Snapchat is now performing a few tests and if at least one of them is positive, an application kills itself when Superuser is found in the system. Needless to say that most of currently available custom ROMs on XDA contain root, so this change may affect thousands if not millions of people.

Looking from user’s perspective, the security should always be kept at the highest level. Blocking application on rooted devices is nevertheless an extremely poor move. Thousands of users will look for an alternative instead of keeping their devices in vanilla state. The social media market is very tight and it’s extremely easy to find a nice replacement without such ridiculous obstacles. I bet that many developers or companies are looking forward to delivering a similar, better-written software alternative with all users in mind, which will fill the gap in no time.

I’m not a security expert, so I’ve asked our very own Senior Recognized Developer pulser_g2 to share his opinion regarding this move. Here’s what he had to say:

Any application which tries to enforce client-side security, as part of its core use-case, is fundamentally flawed. If you are delivering the data to the user, they have it, and you must assume they have it forever. If this was a hobbyist’s “fun” project, it would be acceptable – OK sure, someone can screenshot images, or store them, but that’s fair enough. This isn’t a hobby app though, and it’s trying to do something unachievable. They want to implement DRM on a still image, when even the content producers haven’t managed to make effective DRM. Music labels gave up on it – the idea doesn’t work.

Snapchat would be better putting their time into improving the application – they won’t stop people from screenshotting snapchats (without alerting the other person), if someone actually wants to – next thing, someone will just hook into the kernel and dump the framebuffer output. Good luck detecting or stopping that.

This inconvenience will result in many users dropping Snapchat and looking for some alternative, which will be more user-friendly, customizable and hopefully safe without applying these weird “patches”. If you, however, plan to stick with either Snapchat and root, you might have to give the Snapprefs a spin. MaarZ promised to deliver an update which will remove the root checks from the app. XDA will always find a way!

Is Snapchat’s decision correct? Are you going to stop using this application? Let us know in the comments below!



from xda-developers » xda-developers | Snapchat Is at It Again and Blocks Root Users — but for How Long? http://ift.tt/1PGoGt4
via IFTTT

Settings Mods and Features Megathread

settings

RainbowLaw has begun compiling all the best mods to your SecSettings.apk from across the forums, including such mods as adding additional options, theming and altering your lockscreen it has it all. Check it out



from xda-developers » xda-developers | Settings Mods and Features Megathread http://ift.tt/1Okv7yQ
via IFTTT

vendredi 20 novembre 2015

Exploring the Android Ecosystem in China — Interview with Greenify’s OasisFeng

Google Developers China
Smartphone OS Market Share

Android By the Numbers

Android has dominated the mobile landscape for several years now, and it doesn’t look like that dominance will disappear anytime soon. At Google I/O, Sundar Pichai revealed that there are 1 billion Android users. With the explosive developmental growth in places such as the African continent, India, and China, it’s hard to predict Android’s numbers going anywhere but up.

China is an especially interesting market for Android given the difficulties Google has had in the past dealing with the Chinese government. Even today, the Play Store remains blocked by the Great Firewall in mainland China. What does this mean for Google and Android? Of the nearly 900 million smartphone users in China, approximately 77.4% of those users are operating an Android device. That means there are about 700 million active Android users in China – more than double the population of the United States – and none of them have official access to the Google Play Store!


Android in China

The lack of the Google Play Store in China has led to an interesting situation. In the void left behind by Google’s exit from China, third-party app stores rushed in to compete for dominance. To say that China’s app store marketplace is fragmented would be an understatement. Handset manufacturers, carriers, and independent companies have all ventured into this business to create their own app store, resulting in a confusing mess that turns away many Western developers. Yet, this is one market that developers absolutely cannot ignore, especially now that talented Chinese developers can now market their own apps outside of China, driving up the level of competition.

Consider the current state of the Android ecosystem in China. As mobile app markets continue to consolidate into larger consortiums, a few markets will eventually rise to the top. Indeed, according to a report by NewZoo, the top 10 marketplaces each reach tens of millions of Chinese consumers. Myapp, an app store owned by Tencent, is installed on 25% of Android devices in China, meaning that approximately 175 million people are using this app store. Thus, even the highly fragmented Chinese Android marketplace provides easy access to huge audiences.

Not only are you missing out on a lot of potential revenue by not targeting the Chinese market, you may already be suffering a loss of revenue thanks to copy-cats. The solution is not to sit back and accept that this is how China works, it’s to be pro-active and preempt it before it happens. Piracy of Western apps is only an issue because of how neglected the market has been for so long. Understanding the Chinese market, from the perspective of the average consumer and developer, is therefore a necessary first step when attempting to penetrate the market. To that end, I spoke to XDA Senior Member OasisFeng, developer of the popular battery saving app Greenify, to learn more about Android users in China.


An Interview with OasisFeng

XDA: How would you describe the developer scene in China? Is it thriving? Are there a lot of active communities like XDA/reddit?

OasisFeng: “In China, there’re a huge number of developers, probably far beyond your imagination, since software developer is one of the hottest career choice among college graduates. But due to many factors, the overwhelming majority of them are employed by large companies and working over-time, thus not forming a healthy developer community. Due to the fragmented app markets in China, almost all app-markets promote apps purely by ads, causing apps from independent developers are far less visible to users. This in turn suppresses the growth of developer communities. The only and highly active communities are formed by super users and ROM modders, such as bbs.gfans.com and bbs.hiapk.com. App developers are hardly seen there.”

XDA: Is open-source development popular in the Chinese scene? Why/Why not?

OasisFeng: “Not quite but improving fast. In the past decade, a series of bad examples of huge success by “copy-and-evolve” (QQ and WeChat for instance) drove the whole IT industry to believe that sharing your software may lead to instant threat from huge companies (well-known for copy-cat) to copy your product easier and faster. Things got changed a lot in the recent years, since more and more companies use open-source projects (contribution or new) to advertise their software technologies and attract talented developers. My ex-employer, for example, became the top contributor to Linux kernel among all Chinese companies. My team also open-sourced “Dexposed”, a derived project based on Xposed, and it gains near 2k stars and 500+ forks in a few months.”

XDA: Compared to the West, would you say developers in China are more competitive, collaborative, or generally similar?

OasisFeng: “In my observation, Chinese developers are obviously more collaborative and thus more competitive only as large team, because they’re used to obedience and work as group, which deeply roots in the culture of east. Do you know, most of the popular Android apps in China are made by large company with hundreds of developers. Take Taobao for example, its Android app is developed by more than 200 developers, across 10+ business units in the company. On the opposite, Chinese developers are unlikely to succeed as independent developers or in small teams. I’m an exception actually.”

XDA: How do developers in China usually make money off of their apps?

OasisFeng: “From salary, or in much better case, acquisition by large company. Most independent developers (though rare) cannot go far with their apps, since “pay-for-apps” is not popular among Chinese users. Forget about Ads too, they’re too cheap in China too. For successful ones, the developer behind is most probably contacted by large companies with offer to acquisition or threaten to be copied. Not all of them could resist the threatening offer. Still I’m an exception again.”

XDA: In general, how would you describe the attitude of Chinese consumers towards developers (and applications)? If you can, compare it with your experiences developing for users on XDA.

OasisFeng: “Most Chinese users never visit online communities, they just download the apps recommended by friends and app-markets. Due to the fragmentation of app-markets mentioned above, the apps for daily life are basically seized by large companies and highly-funded startups. Since the apps from large companies always copy competitor’s features, most users even can’t tell the differences from popular apps in the same category, so they just pick one blindly. They don’t care about the developers behind, because most are large companies which seldom respond to users. As a result, only a small number of geek users are willing to communicate with developers. Since China has the largest population in the world, that “small number” is already big enough for developers.

XDA: Is app piracy a big problem in China?

OasisFeng: “App piracy is not a big problem in China, since you can hardly find a paid app here. Talking about foreign (or world-wide-oriented) apps, it’s also no longer a problem in China in the recent years. Though pirated apps are floating around the online forums, they declined fast as users are used to app markets. You can always find a free alternative (probably copied by large company) to most common apps, why bothering seeking for the pirated one?”

XDA: What are people’s attitudes towards privacy in China? Are people more or less concerned about their private data?

OasisFeng: “Most people believed privacy is important at first, but are losing hope these days. As most apps here are developed by large companies, you could never wish for privacy from their hands. Even the company (Qihoo 360 for example) whose products are aiming to privacy protection are stealing privacy, revealed by many security teams again and again. Most friends of mine feel helpless on privacy since government also takes no responsibility in this area.”


Given the recent move by Google to allow Chinese developers to publish their apps on the Play Store outside of China, I decided to also ask OasisFeng about his thoughts on the reputation of Chinese developers and Westerners. After all, we’ve seen some shady attacks on Android users originating from some Chinese companies. This and other attacks have resulted in a reputational hit strong enough to cause fake viruses to scapegoat random “Chinese hackers” in order to scare you into a scam.


XDA: Why do you believe some outsiders have a low opinion of Chinese developers?

OasisFeng: “Chinese developers are among the most diligent workers in the world, most of them work more than 60 hours a week. Also they are creative, but unfortunately their talents are usually directed to the dark side of commercial interests due to lack of supervision and distorted profit model of mobile apps in China. These are both the invisible side of Chinese developers.”

XDA: Do you agree with any of the criticism? If so, which and why?

OasisFeng: “Some users world-wide give criticism of the nasty things behind Chinese apps. These are obviously driven by the brutal commerce environment in China, and should not be judged the same for all of them. If a developer is economically supported by users, then developer will surely give users the best. But in the real world, developers are employed by large companies which are funded by capital. Just like Google and Facebook, Chinese large companies attempt to take hands on more and more user data, but in an immature way … They will learn how to do those things in a more elegant and concealed way when exploring beyond the China market.”

XDA: What can Chinese developers do to combat these ideas about them?

OasisFeng: “The sticking point of the whole issue is the profit model of mobile apps. Western developers are lucky because of paid apps are already accepted by most users. But in China, users are spoiled by free apps made by large companies.

We all like free apps, but developers need to earn their life. In my opinion, “pay for apps” is definitely not the answer (not only in China but also for the world). We need to build a whole new model exclusive for digital goods, to give users the rights to use apps freely (for free and free from ads) while still supporting the creators in profit. [I’ve been looking for] such a new model for years and will hopefully have a chance to make it real in the near future, with the whole developer community. Looking forward to that day, all developers could live a life in proud and honor by themselves, without the employment in a large company.”


I also asked OasisFeng about his personal experiences as an Android developer. If you’re interested in learning more about him and his future development plans, you can see the rest of the interview by following this link. 

Do you use any apps made from Chinese developers? Are you a developer who currently sells their app to Chinese markets? Tell us about your experiences below!

More Reading:



from xda-developers » xda-developers | Exploring the Android Ecosystem in China — Interview with Greenify’s OasisFeng http://ift.tt/1XeRrMw
via IFTTT

Low Battery Generation: A Momentary Spike, or a Downward Trend?

Researchers Say Majority of Android App Communication Bears No Effect on User Experience

Researchers Say a Majority of Android App Communication has No Effect on User Experience

MIT researchers downloaded 500 popular free Android applications from Google Play Store and then monitored the communication made from them to remote servers. They discovered that 63% of the communication with remote servers had “no effect on the user-observable application functionality”. While there could be a good reason for these apps to communicate with servers this often, the researchers feel the user should be informed.



from xda-developers » xda-developers | Researchers Say Majority of Android App Communication Bears No Effect on User Experience http://ift.tt/1NgTAYD
via IFTTT