LightBlog

lundi 24 février 2020

POCO X2 Review: Every Bit Better Than the POCO F1

Xiaomi and its spin-off brand Redmi have always pushed affordability over everything else. In its five-plus-year tenure in India, Xiaomi has radically transformed the dynamics of the smartphone industry in the country. This penchant for making smartphones affordable and accessible to users still shines bright in the company’s vision despite the huge growth and patronage it enjoys. Even against the high value that Xiaomi’s smartphones have to offer, the POCO F1 stood out as an embodiment of practicality. Although it wasn’t perfect, the POCO F1 was a beacon of hope for consumers dismayed at the rising prices of flagship smartphones. The phone was met with high demand and garnered an enthusiastic following, and since its release, users have clamored for an equally high value-driven successor. While POCO has yet to release a successor even after 18 months, the brand’s latest POCO X2 is a contender that could achieve the same acclaim.

POCO X2 review

Unlike the POCO F1, which was more function over form, the POCO X2 is designed to appeal and is as equipped for entertainment as it is for gaming. A major improvement can be seen in terms of the camera, thanks to the new 64MP Sony sensor. But how does the POCO X2 compare to the POCO F1 when it comes to performance, and, well, pretty much everything else? We’ll be addressing all of that in this POCO X2 review.

POCO X2 Forums
Buy POCO F1 on Flipkart (starting ₹15,999)

We have had the 8GB/256GB variant of the POCO X2, which was loaned to us about 4 days before launch in India. Here’s our review of the POCO X2 after almost a month of use.


POCO X2 Specifications

POCO X2 specifications

Specification POCO X2
Dimensions and Weight
  • 165.3 x 76.6 x 8.79 mm
  • 208g
Display
  • 6.67″ FHD+ (2400 x 1080) LCD;
  • 120Hz high refresh rate
  • Punch-hole display with dual front cameras
  • Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • HDR10 support
SoC
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
    • 8nm process
    • 2 x Kryo 460 Gold based on Arm Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz
    • 6 x Kryo 460 Silver based on Arm Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz
  • Adreno 618 @ 575MHz
RAM and Storage
  • 6GB LPDDR4X + 64GB UFS 2.1
  • 6GB + 128GB
  • 8GB + 256GB
  • Hybrid SIM slot for microSD card
Battery & Charging
  • 4,500 mAh battery
  • 27W fast charging
  • Qualcomm Quick Charge 4.0+ support
Rear Camera Photo:
  • Primary: 64MP Sony IMX686 sensor, f/1.9, 1/1.7” sensor
  • Secondary: 8MP 120° Wide-Angle Camera, f/2.2
  • Tertiary: 2MP, f/2.4, Depth Sensor
  • Quaternary: 2MP, Macro with autofocus, f/2.4

Video:

  • 4K @ 30fps
  • 1080p @ 60fps
  • Ultra-wide: 1080p @ 30fps
  • Slow-motion: 1080p @ 120fps, 720p @ 960fps
Front Camera
  • Primary: 20MP, f/2.2
  • Secondary: 2MP depth sensor
Other Features
  • 3.5mm headphone jack
  • IR Blaster
  • Side fingerprint scanner
Android Version MIUI 11 based on Android 10

Design

The POCO X2 is thick and chunky and its extravagant colors lend it a bold appearance. The heft of the phone is unmistakable: the weight breaches the 200g mark, making the phone uncomfortable for users with small hands like mine. This sense of discomfort has stayed with me since my first impressions of the POCO X2. How you feel about the weight of the smartphone comes down to personal preference, so while some users associate it with discomfort, others see it as providing durability and strength. For those who are likely to spend a major portion of their time gaming on the new POCO X2, the heft could be a potential pain point.

POCO X2 review

POCO is now an independent brand, but its close association with Xiaomi and Redmi cannot be understated. The POCO X2 itself is clearly a result of Xiaomi’s support such that the POCO X2 is essentially the same device as the Redmi K30 4G in China, as I noted in my first impressions of the POCO X2. POCO’s version of the story is that the teams from Redmi and POCO collectively designed the device, and therefore, share claims to the original design. Admittedly, the Redmi K30 5G has Redmi’s main attention in China: not only does it support 5G, but it also sports the newer and more powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G mobile platform. Meanwhile, the POCO X2 is limited to India for now, where even trials and spectrum allocation for 5G has yet to commence, and this gap warrants a great market for the new POCO.

POCO X2 review

The POCO X2 takes a different approach from the strictly performance-oriented POCO F1 when it comes to design. The dazzling finishes on all three of the available colors warrant and solicit attention. The glass back packs a holographic design and depending on how you look at it, its reflectivity changes. When looking directly, the back appears to be reflective and shimmery whereas when looking at an angle of about 30º from the flat surface, it renders the illusion of a silky and satiny surface. Besides the glass back panel, the large camera bump surrounding circle – with a convex mirror surface – also draws your attention. At a social gathering, these elements, especially the circle, could put your device in the spotlight, quite literally. This is due to the said circle’s tendency to reflect lights exuberantly. A capsule-shape strip in the center of the camera bump also reflects light in the same manner as the enclosing circle. The back glass, just like the display, is protected by Gorilla Glass 5.

POCO X2 review

In my first impressions of the POCO X2, I noted the button and port placement on the smartphone. Curiously, the side-mounted fingerprint scanner has imbibed much of the attention I paid to the phone’s design. As per team POCO, the side of the smartphone is a more easily accessible location for the fingerprint scanner than the rear, especially for a broad device like the POCO X2. While I can’t argue the convenience that a side-mounted physical scanner offers, I did face a challenge getting used to the height of the button. Unlike the volume rocker, which is a few millimeters above the surface of the frame, the flat power button feels like it is almost flush with the surface, requiring one to apply notably more force to press the button. If you wish to avoid that, MIUI for POCO also gives you the option to unlock the phone just by touching the button (as with the usual/general/common bunch of capacitive fingerprint scanners) but in my experience, that resulted in unwanted unlocks since my right thumb casually rests exactly on top of the fingerprint scanner. My time with the phone was voluntarily split between using the two different ways of unlocking. Despite using the phone for a few weeks now, unlocking the phone with the fingerprint still feels like a challenge.

Instead of being convenient, the placement of the fingerprint scanner right under the natural resting position of the thumb makes it pretty unconvincing for normal usage. Thus, I mostly relied on the software face unlock while using the phone. Unfortunately, as POCO was confident with its placement of the fingerprint scanner on the POCO X2, they got rid of the IR-enhanced face unlocking mechanism from the POCO F1 which worked equally as well at night as it did during the day. The current face unlock system doesn’t work well without adequate lighting, so it is not fully reliable, thus forcing you to go back to depending on the fingerprint scanner. There is definitely a learning curve with the side-mounted fingerprint scanner, but this learning curve is not as steep as the curve for rear-mounted capacitive or in-display optical fingerprint scanners.

https://www.amazon.in/Ringke-Fusion-X-Designed-Resistant-Protection/dp/B0834KF2ZT

Holistically speaking, the glass sandwich design might make the POCO X2 bulky, but it also makes it much more premium and attention-grabbing than the POCO F1. Unlike the F1, there is currently no solid information about any cases or skins from the brand. If you want to protect the POCO X2 without hiding its beautiful design, you can choose the Ringke Fusion-X case. Alternatively, if you want absolute protection without worrying too much about how much of the back design is visible, the KAPAVER Rugged case may be ideal. Both of these cases are claimed to be drop tested against military standards.


Display

The display on the POCO X2 is massive. It extends 6.67 inches diagonally and has a resolution of 2400 x 1080 pixels, resulting in an aspect ratio of 20:9. Due to the large footprint, the pixel density of the screen is around 386ppi, which is lower than the 400-plus values boasted by many competitors. The display technology is LCD and this results in lower contrast and saturated colors as compared to AMOLED display panels.

POCO claims that the POCO X2’s display reaches a max brightness of 500 nits, which is still 100nits (~17%) less than the claimed peak value of the Redmi K20/K20 Pro’s AMOLED display. In terms of color saturation, the display covers 84% of the NTSC color gamut. You can choose a more saturated color profile from MIUI’s display settings, but it will still fall short of AMOLED displays.

https://www.amazon.in/Ringke-Fusion-X-Designed-Resistant-Protection/dp/B0834KF2ZT

The Gorilla Glass 5 makes the display very reflective, and while it is legible even outdoors, it might give you some trouble under direct light or sunlight.

Learning from its past mistakes, POCO has certified the POCO X2 with a Widevine L1 license for playing back DRM content in apps like Netflix, Amazon Prime, etc. While the POCO F1 did receive Widevine L1 via an OTA, the phone still did not support HD playback in Netflix. In contract, the POCO X2 supports Full HD video playback in Netflix and Amazon Prime Video. Additionally, the display is certified for HDR10 just like the POCO F1, and this results in better contrast while watching HDR content in Amazon Prime Video. The POCO X2 does not support HDR content in Netflix, but at this price, that’s a drawback we can live with.

POCO X2 review POCO X2 review

Qualitatively, the LCD on the POCO X2 might not be as good as OLED displays, but it represents a major improvement over the POCO F1. The colors and the brightness of the display feel much more uniform, and the edge bleeding issues are fairly minimized. Further, there aren’t any ghost touch issues that affected some users on the POCO F1. However, the infamous three-finger screenshot bug is still very much present even after two iterations of MIUI. If you drag three fingers down the screen to take a screenshot, the screen continues to register the touch of one finger even after you lift all three fingers up and resets only after you touch the screen again. This is commonly referred to as “ghost touch.” While this is unlikely to affect your daily usage much, it can be a pet peeve for serious gamers.

When viewing bright colors, the display has a uniform color temperature. However, you might notice some variation when viewing darker content. Do note that the variation of color temperature is not as drastic as visible in the images above: they are taken with exposure times set to approximately 3 seconds. In the images, you can also notice that while the dual-hole punch appears to be a single cutout, it, in fact, comprises two separate holes for each front camera.

You can even set the cutout shape to two holes instead of one by setting the “Smallest width” from the Developer options to 381dpi on the Redmi K30. However, this technique does not work on the POCO X2 and we’ve yet to figure out any other workaround. The video below shows how the POCO X2 responds to the change in the “Smallest width” value.

As the video demonstrates, you can either turn the background of the status bar to black or completely turn off the area to make the hole punch cutout a little less visible. Since this is not an AMOLED display, the blackened portion of the screen is still faintly visible.

The biggest reason POCO chose an LCD over AMOLED is so that it could allow users to enjoy a 120Hz refresh rate at this price point. Since the display refreshes 120 times each second (i.e. every 8.3ms), it feels much smoother than a classic 60Hz display which takes twice as much time (~16.7ms) to refresh. In day-to-day use, animations or scrolling on a display with a 120Hz refresh rate would appear much smoother as compared to those on a 60Hz display. Higher refresh rates have been selling points for desktop display manufacturers for several years and are primarily targetted at gamers. With the POCO X2, the company also aims to target users serious about smartphone gaming. Evidently, a 120Hz LCD panel is more economical than a 90Hz AMOLED or Super AMOLED (as seen on OnePlus 7 Pro/7T/7T Pro, Realme X2 Pro, Pixel 4, Xiaomi Mi 10 series, etc.) or a 120Hz Super AMOLED (present on ASUS ROG Phone II and Samsung Galaxy S20 series).

To effectively make use of the 120Hz refresh rate, the phone must be powerful enough to render apps at 120fps. This not only depends on the apps themselves but also on the CPU, the GPU, the Display processor, and an Android service called DisplayFlinger. Even if the SoC is powerful enough to process content fast enough to provide a steady stream of frames that have to be fed to the display, not all apps are optimized to meet that requirement fully. When the rate at which frames are rendered is lower than 120fps, you are bound to see jitter (or jank) on the display, and this is bound to ruin your visual experience. Furthermore, unlike desktop displays, smartphone displays are incapable of self-adjusting the refresh rate to match the frame rate of the content (this property is called V-Sync) and this increases their susceptibility to jank.

POCO undeniably took an ambitious decision by bringing a 120Hz display instead of going for 90Hz. Normally, a smartphone with a flagship processor, like the ASUS ROG Phone II or the Galaxy S20 trio, would have no issues rendering content so quickly, but the Snapdragon 730G can feel inadequate at times. I’ve experienced lag or jitter on the display, especially while loading heavy sites in the Google Chrome browser or while scrolling the feed in social media apps like Instagram, Facebook, or Snapchat. The jank becomes even more apparent when you’re swiping left or right on these apps to go to another section of the app. Fortunately, the POCO X2 also supports gaming at up to 120fps, and while the list of supported games is fairly short (even shorter than the list displayed at the launch event), we can expect this feature to impress mobile gamers. I’ll discuss the POCO X2’s ability to produce consistent framerates while gaming in the performance section.

The 120Hz setting leads to higher consumption of battery, so POCO has added the option to switch back to 60Hz. The refresh rate automatically falls back to 60Hz in the battery saver mode. When you switch to 60Hz, the change is immediately felt, but if you continue to use the phone for a few minutes, going back to the 60Hz refresh stops bothering you. To me, the 120Hz (or even 90Hz) refresh rate is more of a luxury than a necessity.

POCO X2 review first impression review

As for the overall performance of the display, it is bright and crisp enough for indoor usage but might keep you asking for more under sunlight. If your current phone sports an LCD and you’re okay with sticking with LCDs for the sake of a higher refresh rate, then choosing the POCO X2 is a no brainer. Moreover, the large area also makes online video watching quite engaging and entertaining. The display might not be able to render the same quality of colors as an AMOLED display, but if you’re planning to buy the phone primarily for gaming, this display shall serve you well. Lastly, 120Hz is a useful feature and should hopefully support many more apps and games in the future. In the meantime, Redmi is also testing a 144Hz mode for the display, and we could either see that or perhaps a display overclocking mod by the grace of the developer community here at XDA.


Performance

The POCO X2, just like the 4G Redmi K30, is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 730G mobile platform. This announcement was a bit of a let down for fans who were expecting a flagship processor in the second POCO phone, just like the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 on the POCO F1. Clearly, the POCO X2 belongs to a more budget-oriented segment and is not the true successor to the POCO F1. POCO has the intention of launching more premium devices (hopefully a POCO F2), but there is no solid information to back its existence yet. Considering the price, the Snapdragon 730G is one of the best mid-range SoC options available in the market. The suffix G implies that the Snapdragon 730G is meant for gaming. While the SoC is almost identical to the Snapdragon 730, it comes with better graphics performance thanks to an overclocked GPU. Last month, we reviewed the Realme X2, which also comes with the same chipset and is thus expected to have similar performance.

In real-life use, the Snapdragon 730G is a decent performer and can handle most tasks and games pretty easily. As intended, it can also handle the majority of games with ease, although it does tend to heat up during prolonged usage. The POCO X2 comes with a liquid-cooled vapor chamber which helps heat dissipation by conducting heat to the lower parts of the phone. Polycarbonate plastic is a better insulator of heat than glass, so the heat from inside the phone is more likely to be felt at the surface when compared to a phone with a plastic panel. While this means that you will feel more heat, the heat will also radiate to the environment – and make the phone cooler – much more quickly than plastic.

POCO X2 Benchmark Scores

My POCO X2 review unit has 8GB of RAM and 256GB of UFS 2.1 storage. The results of the synthetic benchmarks below are as per the specifications. Besides these, the smartphone comes in 6GB/64GB and 6GB/128GB configurations, and their corresponding benchmark scores could be lower. For comparison, I’ll be putting the POCO X2 against the Realme X2, Redmi Note 8 Pro, and the Redmi K20 (also known as the Xiaomi Mi 9T) since all of these phones are priced under $300 and are meant to appease users who demand great performance. There are a few points for comparison: the CPU on the Snapdragon 845 SoC features Kryo 385 cores based on ARM’s Cortex-A75 and A55 arranged in a 4+4 configuration with 2.8GHz and 1.7GHz frequencies for the performance and the power-efficient cores, respectively, while the Snapdragon 730G uses newer Kryo 470 cores. The Snapdragon 845 is based on a 10nm fabrication process too.

SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G MediaTek Helio G90T
CPU
  • 10nm process
  • 4 x Kryo 385 Gold based on Arm Cortex-A75 @ 2.8 GHz
  • 4 x Kryo 385 Silver based on Arm Cortex-A55 @ 1.76GHz
  • 8nm process
  • 2 x Kryo 460 Gold based on Arm Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz
  • 6 x Kryo 460 Silver based on Arm Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz
  • 12nm process
  • 2 x Arm Cortex-A76 @ 2.05 GHz
  • 6 x Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz
GPU Adreno 630 @ up to 710MHz Adreno 618 @ 575MHz Mali G76 MP4 @ 800MHz

Geekbench 5

POCO X2 review

Starting with Geekbench 5 scores, the single-core and multi-core scores of the POCO X2 are quite comparable to the Redmi K20 (Xiaomi Mi 9T) as well as the Realme X2 because all three feature the same CPU. The Redmi Note 8 Pro lags behind in both comparisons and quite interestingly so does the POCO F1 with its Snapdragon 845 mobile platform. While the Snapdragon 845 was the flagship processor in 2018, it dates back to at least a year before the Snapdragon 730/730G was launched. The Snapdragon 845 is based on older Kyro 385 cores and is manufactured using a 10nm process which is less efficient than the 8nm foundry process used to manufacture the Snapdragon 730G.

Geekbench 5 (Free, Google Play) →

AnTuTu v8

POCO X2 review

Moving on to AnTuTu v8, the POCO X2 and the Realme X2 output comparable results and both of these lag behind the Redmi Note 8 Pro, which scores better in terms of memory and UX. Notably, the higher frequency of the Mali G76 GPU on the MediaTek Helio G90T powering the Redmi Note 8 Pro helps it offer better GPU performance.

AnTuTu Benchmark (Free, Google Play) →

PCMark Work 2.0

POCO X2 review

Next up, in PCMark Work 2.0 scores, the POCO X2 outperforms the POCO F1 in all tests. In comparison to the Realme X2, the POCO X2 has a higher overall score and has better results in three out of five tests. All of these devices lag behind the Redmi Note 8 Pro, which breached the 10,000-point mark in Arol’s review of the phone. However, since the POCO X2 and the Redmi Note 8 Pro have a difference of only 300 points, they will have comparable performance in the routine productivity tasks that PCMark simulates.

PCMark for Android Benchmark (Free, Google Play) →

GPU Benchmarks

POCO X2 review benchmarks POCO X2 review benchmarks

I wasn’t able to run either of the two prominent GPU-centric synthetic benchmarks – 3DMark and GFXBench – as the POCO X2 kept throwing a vague connectivity error in both cases, which we weren’t able to troubleshoot.

3DMark - The Gamer's Benchmark (Free, Google Play) →

GFXBench Benchmark (Free, Google Play) →

AndroBench

POCO X2 review

Lastly, we use AndroBench to measure how fast the storage is on each of these devices. Notably, all of these come with UFS 2.1 NAND storage chips. As expected, all of the other phones except the POCO F1 have similar sequential and random read speeds. Meanwhile, dual-channel transfer support in the Snapdragon 800 series chips allows the POCO F1 to have a higher sequential read speed as compared to the others. Further, both the POCO devices lead in terms of sequential write speeds while the POCO X2 has the highest random write speed of the bunch.

Androbench (Storage Benchmark) (Free, Google Play) →

CPU Throttling

High performance also makes the smartphone more susceptible to heating. So, to prevent any component damage due to overheating, smartphone companies often use algorithms to throttle or restrict a phone’s performance with the rise in internal temperature. The POCO X2 also comes with an internal liquid-cooling vapor chamber to dissipate the heat being given off by the SoC. To test the efficiency of the heat sink and POCO X2’s thermal throttling, I used an app called CPU Throttling Test, which uses single-thread and multi-thread benchmark tests written in C and Java. The following results occurred when the phone was sitting idle and while the phone was being charged.

Surprisingly, the POCO X2 showed a noticeable amount of throttling in both cases. Over time, the decline in performance becomes visible. After the 15-minute-long test, the CPU performance is found to have throttled to 83% of the peak performance. While charging, the peak performance is already reduced by 18%, and on top of that, the CPU is throttled to 88% of peak performance of the session. When putting this together, the performance is effectively throttled to around 72% of the peak performance without charging. This indicates that the POCO X2 does drop in performance when it gets hot. In contrast, the Realme X2 barely showed any signs of slowing down when the same test was used to test throttling on that phone.

CPU Throttling Test (Free, Google Play) →

Gaming

When it comes to gaming, the POCO X2 is very well-equipped. Qualcomm targets the Snapdragon 730G as a sub-flagship processor and the POCO X2 brings it at the lowest price among well-known brands. One of the advantages that the POCO X2 has over its competitors in this price range is the 120Hz refresh rate display, which means that you will be able to play certain games at up to 120fps. At present, only a handful of games support 120fps gameplay on the phone. I played each of the following games for about 15 minutes to test how consistently the POCO X2 allows gaming above 60fps. The performance was measured using GameBench Pro, a tool that allows you to benchmark real-world gaming performance.

GameBench Pro [Account Required] (Free, Google Play) →

Do note that all of these games were played with MIUI’s built-in game booster enabled.

Dead Trigger 2

Starting off with the second zombie apocalypse game in the Dead Trigger series, POCO X2 renders a median of 114fps. The frame rate was mostly above the 100fps mark while in the game but dropped majorly during cut scenes and loading screens, resulting in a variability index of 7.13fps. The majority of the frame rate drops while playing can be noticed when a zombie comes too close and starts attacking you or there is a sudden change of the background. Since the game is not very demanding in terms of GPU usage, the FPS sails above the 100fps mark consistently.

DEAD TRIGGER 2 - Zombie Survival Shooter FPS (Free+, Google Play) →

Hitman GO

Hitman GO is the board game version of the classic title revolving around the life of a contractual assassin, identified as Agent 47. The game is a respite from the regular violence and savagery and offers very smooth gameplay on the POCO X2. The frame rate is maintained around 115fps throughout the missions and drops to about 85fps on loading screens. Since the missions in the game are very small, the FPS stability is only 78%, but the median of 116fps indicates how well the POCO X2 can run the game. There’s no major frame drop while playing the game.

Hitman GO ($0.99+, Google Play) →

Dub Dash

Dub Dash is quite an interesting game and you have to control a wheel and dodge it from obstructions while rolling over a spherical surface. The moves intended to dodge the hurdles are beautifully synced with sets of electronic beats introduced within the gameplay. On the POCO X2, Dub Dash worked effortlessly and easily produced a consistent frame rate of about 115fps. The game, however, has ads which run at 30fps, resulting in the FPS stability to fall with each game over.

Dub Dash (Free+, Google Play) →

Battlelands Royale

Battlelands is like a minion version of an online battle royal shooter but instead of the close third-person view, you get an aerial view which makes it more difficult and thus, more engaging. While playing the game on the POCO X2, it starts with an average FPS of about 105fps. But over the duration of a game, as the safe zone gets smaller and smaller and the competition gets fiercer, the frame rate drops to about 70fps. Thus, despite a good start, the median frame rate is only 87fps while the FPS stability is only 67%.

Battlelands Royale (Free+, Google Play) →

Alto’s Adventure

Alto’s Adventure is perhaps the lightest game among all of the ones listed here. For the same reason, the POCO X2 can churn out a consistent – and the highest among all games tested – frame rate with a median of 119fps and an FPS stability of 96%. The only frame drops are seen when Alto falls off the snowboard and the next game is being loaded.

Alto's Adventure (Free+, Google Play) →

Notably, while Alto’s Odyssey is also expected to run at 120fps, the game didn’t run past 60fps.

Lara Croft GO

In Lara Croft Go, the protagonist from the classic series Tomb Raider makes her way through a series of obstacles, and you have to guide her in a step-by-step movement while all of this is shown from an isometric perspective. Although it has a similar concept to Hitman GO, the number of details makes the game very graphically demanding – and this shows while playing it on the POCO X2. From the beginning, the frame rate stays low – around 90-95fps – and only tends to drop over the course of gameplay. Over time, the frame rate comes down to about 85fps – which isn’t bad but isn’t as good as what some of the lighter games above rendered.

Lara Croft GO ($5.99+, Google Play) →

Vainglory

If you’ve ever played League of Legends on PC or Arena of Valor on mobile, you’ll find Vainglory very similar. Not only that, the game is visually very stimulating, which makes it quite engaging – and therefore, graphically demanding. While navigating through the game’s menu, the POCO X2 can easily achieve frame rates in the ballpark of 115fps. However, within the actual game, the frame rate floats between 85fps and 100fps. Over the course of a 5v5 match, the frame rate drops gradually as the phone starts to heat up. 10 minutes into the match, the frame rate sinks below 80fps and eventually falls to lower than 60fps by the end. As a result, the FPS stability value is only about 71%. Furthermore, there are significant frame drops when a lot of allies and enemies are fighting together with ultimate moves. Notably, the phone also gets very hot after an intense 5v5 session which can last up to 25-30 minutes.

Vainglory (Free+, Google Play) →

A great choice for gaming

The POCO X2 pretty much lives up to its hype when it comes to gaming. It can play some visually stimulating titles with high frame rates while also managing to let you play much more popular titles like COD Mobile, Asphalt 9, PUBG Mobile, etc. at maxed out graphic settings. We do expect to see more 120fps options in the future, and people who buy the POCO X2 right now will be delighted about their choice. Till then, they can continue to brag about the smooth animations and scrolling that the phone is capable of.


Cameras

Among the biggest cameras upgrades on the POCO X2 over the POCO F1 are the new quad-camera setup on the back and the dual selfie cameras on the front. The setup on the back is extra special since this is one of the first smartphones to have the 64MP Sony IMX686 sensor. With a sensor size of 1/1.7″, the 64MP Sony sensor is slightly larger than the 1/1.72″ Samsung ISOCELL Bright GW1 sensor which we saw on phones like the Realme X2 and the X2 Pro. Both of these sensors use tiny 0.8μm along with 4-in-1 pixel binning which results in 16MP shots. You can, however, also capture 64MP images in both cases. The Sony sensor is paired with an f/1.9 aperture lens.

POCO X2 review

Alongside the 64MP primary sensor, the POCO X2 has an 8MP fixed-focus camera with a 120º field of view, a 2MP macro camera with PDAF (phase-detect autofocus), and a 2MP depth sensor. All of these cameras are arranged in a single line along the center of the smartphone and inside a huge camera bump. A dual-LED flash lies below the camera bump flushed with the glass back.

I took the camera for a trip to one of Delhi’s oldest monuments to try out how it fares while capturing light bouncing off archaic architecture. Starting with the primary camera, the Sony IMX686 lives up to the expectations set by the predecessor – the 48MP Sony IMX586 – which was a hit camera sensor in 2019. The amount of details in the 16MP images taken with the primary camera is incredible. With the help of pixel binning, the camera captures an ample amount of light both indoors and outdoors. Furthermore, the color tone is neutral without any oversaturation – unlike in Realme phones.

POCO X2 Samples

Like we mentioned before, the Sony sensor can also take images at full resolution, i.e. at 64MP. There is a dedicated 64MP mode in the MIUI camera app on the POCO X2 right next to the Photo mode. The resulting 64MP images are quite large, with each taking up about 25MB of storage. In a side by side comparison, the 16MP images appear significantly sharper than the 64MP images. Furthermore, the 16MP images are better illuminated and have more contrast. At night, the images are quite similar, and you wouldn’t notice any major difference, especially since both suffer from the lack of clarity almost equally.

POCO X2 [16MP vs 64MP]

The 64MP images take a second or two to process, and this requires you to keep the phone very stable or you’ll blur the image very easily. The only visible benefit of taking images 64MP is that it can – to some extent – fill the gap created by the absence of a telephoto camera.

poco x2 review 64mp sony imx686 poco x2 review 64mp sony imx686 poco x2 review 64mp sony imx686 poco x2 review 64mp sony imx686

POCO X2 camera samples cropped to about 10% of the frame; 16MP images on the left and 64MP images on the right

If you crop out a small section of the images and compare them side-by-side, you’ll notice that the 16MP images have brighter shadows and highlights. However, when you zoom in too close on a certain far off object, you can easily see that the sharpness from the 16MP images turns into noise. Even though the 64MP images are not as crisp, they have less structural noise relatively.

POCO X2 Night Mode

Moving on to low-light photography, the POCO X2’s night mode uses multiple shots at various ISO levels and stitches them together for a bright image, instead of using the long-exposure method for taking night shots. The Night mode on the POCO X2 amplifies the highlights in images while the shadows remain more-or-less preserved. The images with Night mode ON are, however, slightly more noisy than without it.

POCO X2 Wide Angle

Coming to the wide-angle camera of the POCO X2, this setup appears quite similar to the Redmi K20 Pro (also known as the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro). The 8MP sensor is paired with an f/2.2 aperture lens, which results in slightly less light as compared to the primary camera. In a side-by-side comparison, you can see that the wide-angle camera clicks more HDR-ish images which have a lower brightness as compared to the primary camera. This does give the impression that images have more saturation, but in reality, this is just a mechanism to cope with the poorer exposure. The amount of detail is evidently lower while there is more noise as compared to the primary camera. Indoors and under low light, the wide-angle images tend to have more structural distortion.

POCO X2 Macro

The POCO X2 also gets a 2MP macro camera, which supports auto-focus, allowing it to capture crisp images of objects that are as close as 2cm. While the colors are not as vibrant as the primary camera, the level of detail is remarkable.

POCO X2 Portrait Mode

The smartphone also uses a 2MP depth sensor for accurately capturing edges of the foreground to differentiate with the background. In this use case, the POCO X2 does quite well in both outdoor and indoor lighting conditions.

POCO X2 Selfies

Lastly, for selfies, the POCO X2 features dual cameras on the front. The primary camera on the front takes 20MP images while the secondary camera is a 2MP depth sensor for more accurate edge detection. The primary selfie camera captures clear facial details in selfies, but there is a slight bit of skin smoothening even when the beautification mode is turned off. Unlike the primary camera, the front camera does not support pixel binning, but despite that, selfies turn out to have sufficient light. Furthermore, the edge detection is also very good, and MIUI allows features like stage lighting and Color pop to accentuate the face or object in the foreground.

When it comes to videos, the rear primary camera supports 4K recording but only at up to 30fps. It does, however, capture 1080p video at up to 60fps. Besides the primary camera, you can also use the wide-angle and macro cameras to take videos. While wide-angle videos are capped at 1080p at 30fps, you can also capture 720p videos at 30fps max using the macro camera. POCO X2 also gets other MIUI camera features such as slow-motion videos at up to 960fps whereas EIS is also supported for videos taken with the primary and the wide-angle cameras.

All in all, the 64MP quad-camera setup on the back and dual camera setup on the front seems like a useful package for smartphone photography enthusiasts. The only limitation of this camera is the lack of support for 4K video recording at 60fps. We hope to see a Google Camera mod for the POCO X2 to be available soon with support for all the cameras.


Battery

The POCO X2 is equipped with a 4500mAh battery which can easily last through a day with moderately demanding use. In my experience, the battery easily lasted 24+ hours with the 120Hz screen setting turned on. In the screenshots below, you can see that the POCO X2’s battery lasted about 30 hours with 5.5 hours of SOT (screen-on time) and about 23.5 hours with 7 hours of SOT. That is remarkable for a phone with as large a display as the POCO X2.

The POCO X2 comes with a 27W charger which is rated for Qualcomm Quick Charge 3.0. While recharging with the 27W charger, the POCO X2 takes only about 65 minutes to go from 10% to 100% with the phone switched ON. In contrast, using the 18W Xiaomi charger supplied along with the Redmi K20 series (or POCO F1), the journey from 10% to 100% battery takes about 100 minutes.

poco x2 review

In comparison, Realme’s 30W VOOC 4.0 charger takes about 70 minutes to refill the Realme X2’s 4000mAh battery from 10% to 100%. This means that despite the lower power output, the POCO X2 charges faster than the Realme X2.


Connectivity

The POCO X2 comes with standard connectivity options such as Bluetooth 5.0, 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi, and LTE-Advanced, which implies that the phone supports carrier aggregation on supported telecom operators. Further, the POCO X2 supports the following LTE bands:

  • TDD: B40/41 (120MHz)
  • FDD: B1/B3/B5/B8

Since the POCO X2 is only sold in India, its support for LTE bands is fairly restricted. Additionally, the smartphone supports dual LTE for seamless switching between SIM cards for data connectivity alongside dual VoLTE and VoWiFi support for HD calling.

For positioning, the POCO X2 supports GPS, GLONASS, and BeiDou. The Redmi K30 4G also gets Galileo support, but this specification is missing from the POCO X2’s specifications page. Notably, the phone lacks dual-frequency positioning and does not support India’s NavIC positioning system.

In terms of physical connectivity, the POCO X2 has a 3.5mm headphone jack and a USB 2.0 Type-C port. Both the headphone jack and the USB-C port can be used for audio playback.


POCO X2 XDA Forums, Bootloader Unlocking, and Custom ROMs/Kernel Development

POCO F1 received an overwhelming amount of support from the community of developers at XDA, and we hope the same can happen for the POCO X2. To begin with, POCO has promised day-zero kernel source releases, which means that the kernel sources will be updated with each new update on the day of the update’s release. Further, the waiting period for unlocking the POCO X2’s bootloader is also 72 hours (3 days) as opposed to the usual 168-hour waiting period for other Xiaomi devices.

POCO X2 XDA Forums

On top of that, POCO is also sending POCO X2 units to several renowned developers in the community who will utilize the device to test and fine-tune custom kernels, custom ROMs, and other mods like the unofficial Google Camera port. This is likely to set the basic framework for a healthy custom development ecosystem for the POCO X2. If you already own the POCO X2, make sure to check out our POCO X2 Forums. The bootloader of the phone cannot currently be unlocked, but POCO assures us that this just a temporary hitch which they are working on getting rectified — the bootloader on the phone will be unlockable soon enough.


POCO X2: Sporting a crown of thorns

Looking at its price, the value that the POCO X2 offers is in line with other devices in the Xiaomi ecosystem. The POCO X2 supersedes the POCO F1 and is better than the latter in almost every sense with its bigger and smoother display, an improved and more versatile camera setup, better performance, a bigger battery, and so on. However, it shies away from being a true successor to the POCO F1, and the lack of a tangible POCO F2 has led to a sense of dissatisfaction among the fans who have eagerly been waiting for another flagship-killer from POCO.

There’s no clear promise of a POCO F2, but the brand does plan to launch more premium devices over the year. However, until the POCO F2 launches, the POCO X2 will be compared to the POCO F1 time and time again.

16 vs 64 POCO X2 Camera sample

In isolation from the POCO F1, the POCO X2 is a very lucrative device and one of the top choices in its price range. All of its features such as the 64MP camera, the 120Hz display, glass design, a large battery with 27W fast charging, and options up to 8GB RAM and 256GB storage add up to make a valuable package. In many ways, the Snapdragon chipset could also cannibalize the sales of the Redmi Note 8 Pro. POCO will continue to leverage Xiaomi’s network of sales and after-sales to be able to distribute and service POCO X2 units effectively.

Lastly, the opportunities for custom development for the POCO X2 make it even more exciting than it already is. You can expect to hear more from us soon about upcoming mods, custom recoveries, kernels, and custom ROMs.

Buy POCO F1 on Flipkart (starting ₹15,999)

The post POCO X2 Review: Every Bit Better Than the POCO F1 appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/2HQiSxL
via IFTTT

dimanche 23 février 2020

OnePlus Gallery 3.8.21 adds face detection, scene recognition, and auto-generated story albums for your photos

Back in May last year, OnePlus opened up a beta program for the OnePlus Gallery app to give enthusiasts a chance to get an early preview of upcoming features in the app. In return, feedback from the beta testers allowed the company to continually improve the app and bring several new features in quick succession. Since then, the company has released several updates for the app introducing a couple of new features like a shortcut to hide photos, support for viewing HEIC images, and a new image sorting setting. Now, with the latest update, OnePlus is rolling out three more features for the app.

OnePlus Gallery

The OnePlus Gallery v3.8.21 is now rolling out on the Play Store and it includes a new face classification feature that will help users group pictures faster, a new scene recognition feature to identify scenes in real life, and an auto-generated story album feature to automatically create stories using your photos. The new Story feature can be found within the Explore tab on the app and as per the description it will “automatically create your own stories while your phone is charging and the screen is off.” Here’s the complete changelog for the OnePlus Gallery v3.8.21 update:

  • Added face classification to group pictures faster
  • Added scene recognition to identify scenes in life
  • Added auto-generated story album to create your stories

If you’re a OnePlus user and you wish to try out all the cool new features in the latest Gallery update, you can download the updated APK from APKMirror or click on the Play Store link below to update the app.

OnePlus Gallery (Free, Google Play) →


Thanks to XDA Senior Member Some_Random_Username for the tip and the screenshot!

The post OnePlus Gallery 3.8.21 adds face detection, scene recognition, and auto-generated story albums for your photos appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/37QgAJt
via IFTTT

Realme C3 Gaming Review: Excellent Budget Gaming Performance with the MediaTek Helio G70

Realme opened shop in India back in 2018 with the Realme 1 — a MediaTek Helio P60 powered budget handset that proved to be the beginning of a remarkable journey for the brand. At first, the brand released a slew of budget handsets aimed at the growing number of first-time smartphone buyers in the country. However, Realme has since matured into a formidable smartphone player in India with a strong portfolio of offerings in a few different categories. In addition, the company has also expanded to several international markets, including Europe, where it offers some of its most popular mid-range and flagship devices. Over the course of last year, Realme launched more than 10 smartphones in the 18 countries where it currently operates, and the company finally entered the value flagship space with the launch of the Realme X2 Pro (review). Realme made yet another bold move late last year with the launch of the Realme X50 5G in China, which is the first 5G-enabled smartphone from the company. While Realme was preparing to launch the X50 and the upcoming X50 Pro internationally, the company kicked off 2020 with the launch of the Realme C3 — an entry-level smartphone in the sub ₹10,000 category.

Realme C3

As its name suggests, the Realme C3 is the third device in the company’s C Series that offers entry-level specifications at a very affordable price point. Much like the Realme C1 and C2, the C3 packs in an entry-level processor, an HD+ (720p) display, and a dual-camera setup. However, while the C1 and C2 packed in tried and true SoCs like the Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 and MediaTek Helio P22 respectively, the Realme C3 is the first smartphone to be powered by the new MediaTek Helio G70 chipset. The SoC was announced earlier this year in January and, at the time, MediaTek marketed the SoC as a chip for budget gaming smartphones. The octa-core CPU features a combination of ARM Cortex-A75 big cores clocked at 2GHz and ARM Cortex-A55 little cores clocked at 1.7GHz. Much like the Helio G90T, which is a more powerful gaming chip from the company, the G70 also features MediaTek’s HyperEngine technology which is meant to enhance gaming performance. We’ve already taken a look at the performance of the Helio G90T in our review of the Redmi Note 8 Pro and in this post, we’ll be taking a look at how the new MediaTek G70 holds up in the Realme C3.

For the purpose of this Realme C3 review, I used the 4/64GB variant which was loaned to us by Realme India. It’s also worth noting that the review unit runs Realme UI v1.0 based on Android 10, making it the first smartphone from the company to include the new UI out of the box.

Buy the Realme C3 from Flipkart: 3/32GB for ₹6,999 || 4/64GB for ₹7,999

Realme C3 Forums


Realme C3 specifications

Specifications Realme C3
Dimensions & Weight
  • 164.4 × 75.0 × 8.95 mm
  • 195g
Display
  • 6.52-inch LCD
  • 720 x 1600
SoC
  • MediaTek Helio G70
  • Mali G52 GPU
RAM 3GB/4GB
Storage
  • 32GB eMMC 5.1
  • 64GB

Dedicated microSD slot

Battery 5000mAh, 10W charging, reverse wired charging
Rear Camera
  • 12MP primary
  • 2MP depth sensor
Front Camera
  • 5MP
Android Version Realme UI v1.0 based on Android 10
Colors Frozen Blue, Blazing Red

Benchmarks: Realme C3 vs Redmi Note 7 Pro vs Realme 5 Pro

I tested the Realme C3 using a few synthetic benchmarking apps, including Geekbench 4, AnTuTu, PCMark, 3DMark, etc. We compared the scores posted by the Realme C3 with those from the Snapdragon 675-powered Redmi Note 7 Pro (review) and the Snapdragon 712-powered Realme 5 Pro (review). This helps us gauge where the MediaTek Helio G70 stands in comparison to its Snapdragon alternatives. Before we head to the results, however, let’s first talk about the specifications of the three SoCs in consideration.

The MediaTek Helio G70, as mentioned above, packs in a combination of ARM Cortex-A75 big cores and ARM Cortex- A55 little cores clocked in at 2GHz and 1.7GHz, respectively. The SoC is manufactured using the 12nm FinFET process and it includes an ARM Mali-G52 GPU for enhanced graphics performance. In comparison, the Snapdragon 675 inside the Redmi Note 7 Pro packs in two ARM Cortex-A76 big cores clocked at 2GHz and six ARM Cortex-A55 little cores clocked at 1.7GHz. The SoC is manufactured using Samsung’s 11nm LPP process and makes use of an Adreno 612 GPU. Finally, the Snapdragon 712 on the Realme 5 Pro features two Kryo 360 Gold cores (based on ARM Cortex-A75) clocked at 2.3GHz and six Kryo 360 Silver cores (based on ARM Cortex-A55) clocked at 1.7GHz. The SoC is manufactured using Samsung’s 10nm LPP process and makes use of the Adreno 616 GPU.

Note: The benchmark results in this comparison have been collected from the 4/64GB variant of the Redmi Note 7 Pro, the 8/128GB variant of the Realme 5 Pro, and the 4/64GB variant of the Realme C3. For the sake of transparency, it’s also worth mentioning that there’s a significant price difference between the three devices. The 4/64GB variant of the Redmi Note 7 Pro currently retails for ₹9,999 (~$139), the 8/128GB variant of the Realme 5 Pro retails for ₹14,999 (~$208), and the 4/64GB variant of the Realme C3 is priced at ₹7,999 (~$111).

Specification Realme C3 Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro Realme 5 Pro
SoC MediaTek Helio G70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
SoC Setup
  • 12nm FinFET process
  • 2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2GHz
  • 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.7GHz
  • 11nm LPP process
  • 2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2GHz
  • 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @1.7GHz
  • 10nm LPP process
  • 2x ARM Cortex-A75 (Kryo 360 Gold) @ 2.3GHz
  • 6x ARM Cortex-A55 (Kryo 360 Silver) @ 1.7GHz
GPU ARM Mali-G52 Adreno 612 Adreno 616
RAM and Storage variant used in comparison 4GB/64GB 4GB/64GB 8GB/128GB
Pricing at time of comparison ₹7,999 (~$111) ₹9,999 (~$139) ₹14,999 (~$208)
Launched in February 2020 February 2019 August 2019

Now that we’ve got the specifications out of the way, let’s take a look at the benchmark scores.

CPU and GPU performance

First off, Geekbench gives us an overall look at the phone’s general CPU performance. With a single-core score of 1825 and a multi-core score of 5752, the Helio G70-powered Realme C3 performs almost as well as the Snapdragon 712-powered Realme 5 Pro, but it significantly lags behind the Redmi Note 7 Pro with its Snapdragon 675. This is, most likely, due to the fact that the Redmi Note 7 Pro’s Snapdragon 675 makes use of the newer ARM Cortex-A76 cores on the chipset instead of the older Cortex-A75 cores or derivatives found on the other two SoCs.

Similarly, in the PCMark Work 2.0 system performance benchmark, the Realme C3 performs just as well (sometimes even better) than the Realme 5 Pro. However, this time around, it beats the Redmi Note 7 Pro by a significant margin. The Helio G70 on the Realme C3 consistently delivers better results in the benchmark’s web browsing, video editing, writing, and photo editing tests, but it falls behind the other two devices in the data manipulation test. Overall, the Realme C3 manages to achieve a score of 8587, closely followed by the Realme 5 Pro at 7910, with the Redmi Note 7 Pro lagging behind at 7467.

The Redmi Note 7 Pro continues to lag behind in the 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme benchmark, with the Realme 5 Pro taking the lead this time around and the Realme C3 taking the second spot. This is due to the fact that the Adreno 612 GPU on the Redmi Note 7 Pro isn’t as powerful as the Adreno 616 on the Realme 5 Pro. The ARM Mali-G52 GPU on the Realme C3, however, just manages to outperform the Adreno 612 by a small margin. This means that the Realme C3 can be expected to perform better than the Redmi Note 7 Pro in applications and games with heavy 3D usage.

Now, let’s take a look at the AndroBench scores posted by the three devices, which will give us some idea of the storage speeds on the Realme C3 and its impact on the device’s performance. It’s worth noting, however, that the Realme C3 and the Redmi Note 7 Pro offer eMMC 5.1 storage, while the Realme 5 Pro offers UFS 2.1 storage. As you’d already know, UFS 2.1 storage is considerably faster than eMMC storage which should, on paper, give the Realme 5 Pro an edge over the other two devices. But due to the fact that the Snapdragon 712 doesn’t support dual-channel simultaneous data transfer, the UFS 2.1 read and write speeds on the Realme 5 Pro aren’t all that different from eMMC on the device.

Sure, the Realme 5 Pro takes a lead by a significant margin in Sequential Read speeds, but the device performs just about the same (or even worse) in other tests. The Realme C3, in comparison, performs better than the Redmi Note 7 Pro in Sequential Read speeds and just about the same as the Realme 5 Pro in Sequential Write speeds. The Realme C3 does lag behind both the other processors in Random Read speeds, but it takes a decent lead against the other two in Random Write speeds.

Keeping the aforementioned numbers in mind, it’s safe to say that the Helio G70-powered Realme C3 falls squarely in between the Redmi Note 7 Pro and Realme 5 Pro in terms of performance. However, since there’s a major price difference between the three devices, the Realme C3 delivers a better bang for your buck if we just take theoretical performance into consideration. When compared to other devices in the price range, like the Redmi 8, Redmi 8A, Samsung Galaxy M10s, and Nokia 4.2, the Realme C3 appears to be miles ahead of the competition. This is due to the fact that these devices pack in significantly less powerful SoCs like the Snapdragon 439 and the Exynos 7884B.

Thermal throttling

Most smartphones these days come equipped with some form of heat reduction. While some pack in hardware level features to dissipate heat more efficiently, all devices include throttling algorithms for the CPU and GPU to limit the components and protect them from overheating-induced damage. This, in turn, results in visibly poor performance when the smartphone heats up and the components thermally throttle. To test if there’s any thermal throttling on the Realme C3, I used an app called CPU Throttling Test, and here are the results.

The graph to the left shows the results obtained when running the thermal throttling test on the Realme C3 without enabling the included Game Space Competition Mode. The one in the middle shows the results obtained when the app is accelerated using the Competition Mode, and the one on the right shows results when the device is put on charging and the Game Space Competition Mode was enabled. In the first run without the Game Space Competition Mode enabled, the CPU usage is throttled at around 86% of peak performance. When using Game Space Competition Mode, however, the CPU is throttled to 94% of peak performance. Lastly, when the test was run with the device on charging, the CPU throttled to 89% of peak performance.

Realme C3 Competition mode

For the unaware, the Game Space Competition Mode in Realme UI claims to improve the performance of games (or apps) at the cost of increasing battery drain. However, in our test, we observed that instead of providing peak performance, as its name suggests, the Competition Mode offers a higher level of performance that is sustained over a longer time frame. This means that the Game Space Competition Mode on the device is theoretically effective at preventing thermal throttling during long gaming sessions. Even while charging the device, you’ll be able to achieve better performance with the mode turned on. In real-life use, the Realme C3 doesn’t heat up a lot while gaming which is a good sign for users who enjoy long gaming sessions. The thermal throttling is rather insignificant if you have the Game Space Competition Mode turned on, and you will be able to continue gaming without any noticeable performance drop, even with the phone plugged in and charging.


Realme C3: Gaming Performance

Speaking of gaming, I played a couple of popular games on the device during my testing and I was pleasantly surprised by its performance. The list included some of the usual picks like Asphalt 9, PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty: Mobile, and Dead Effect 2. Here’s how the device performed in all of these titles.

Asphalt 9

Starting with Asphalt 9, the Realme C3 delivers stutter-free performance. However, it automatically selects the High Performance setting, which prioritizes gameplay over graphics quality. After switching over to the High Graphics setting though, I noticed that the gameplay wasn’t as smooth. While performing stunts, drifting or taking down opponents, the game feels very choppy. But all of this disappeared as soon as I switched back to the performance setting. So, if you stick to the High Performance setting, you should have absolutely no problems enjoying Asphalt 9 on the Realme C3.

Asphalt 9: Legends - Epic Car Action Racing Game (Free+, Google Play) →

PUBG Mobile

With PUBG Mobile, the Realme C3 automatically selected the HD graphics setting and the High frame rate preset. These are the highest available settings on the device and the game performs quite well on the default settings. I didn’t see any stuttering or frame drops in-game and it was a pleasant experience overall until I tried to adjust the display brightness. Pulling down the notification shade while in-game caused the UI to stutter, but as soon as I closed the notification shade, everything went back to normal. If you’re planning on playing PUBG Mobile on the device, I would recommend that you avoid opening the notification shade unless you’re idling in the lobby.

PUBG MOBILE (Free+, Google Play) →

Call of Duty: Mobile

This aforementioned issue continued while playing Call of Duty: Mobile on the device. Unlike PUBG Mobile, though, COD selected the low graphics quality preset by default, with the frame rate set to medium. All of the other options, including Depth of Field, Bloom, Real-time Shadows, and Ragdoll, were disabled and the game worked flawlessly with these settings. As with PUBG Mobile, the phone’s UI stuttered when I pulled the notification shade down, but other than that, I had no complaints. Sure, the graphics have been dumbed down quite a bit but that’s just something one should expect from a device in this price range.

Call of Duty®: Mobile (Free+, Google Play) →

Dead Effect 2

Finally, in Dead Effect 2, the visual quality was medium by default, with shadows, bloom and anisotropy turned off. With these settings, the Realme C3 managed to run the game without a hitch and I had absolutely no issues with gameplay. Interestingly, the UI stuttering wasn’t as evident while playing the game at default settings. Upon switching all the presets to high though, the stuttering issue reappears, though the gameplay remained just as smooth.

Dead Effect 2 (Free+, Google Play) →

So, in conclusion, if you stick to the default settings in each game on the Realme C3, you’ll have a great time with the device. As long as you keep the notification shade access to a minimum, you shouldn’t experience any stuttering in-game, and that’s definitely quite good for a device in this price range. Of course, one would always prefer not disabling any graphic setting, but you need to temper your expectations with the price you are paying for the device.


Battery life and Charging

The Realme C3 packs in a massive 5,000 mAh battery with support for 10W charging and reverse wired charging. The battery, coupled with the 720p display and battery optimizations in Realme UI, easily lasted me two days on a single charge with a screen-on-time of around 6 hours. After a full day of use, including gaming for about two hours, I was left with almost 50% battery, and that barely dropped overnight. I continued using the device the next day, and it dropped to 17% after the second full day of use.

Sadly, though, the slow charging speed and the massive battery meant that the Realme C3 took fairly long to charge back up to 100%. The device took around two and a half hours to go from 17 to 100%, which means that it would be best to charge it overnight. I wasn’t able to test the reverse wired charging as I did not have a compatible cable. Keep in mind that the Realme C3 has a microUSB port.


Realme C3: A great entry-level device for gaming

The Realme C3 is an excellent entry-level Android device for mobile gamers on a very tight budget. The MediaTek Helio G70 on the device manages to hold its own in day-to-day use and gaming alike, delivering solid performance all around. Other than the unusual UI stuttering issue I mentioned earlier, I have absolutely no qualms about the Realme C3’s performance, and I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend it to anyone looking to purchase a phone under the ₹10,000 mark with a focus on gaming.

Realme C3

Along with great performance, the MediaTek Helio G70 also enables some additional features, like hardware-level bokeh, in the Realme C3 that weren’t available in its predecessor, the Realme C2. And finally, thanks to Realme UI, the software experience also feels very polished and feature-rich.

Buy the Realme C3 from Flipkart: 3/32GB (₹6,999) || 4/64GB (₹7,999)

Realme C3 Forums

The post Realme C3 Gaming Review: Excellent Budget Gaming Performance with the MediaTek Helio G70 appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/2Pi3gaA
via IFTTT

Pixel Launcher in Android 11 tests new actions in recent apps overview, hiding individual app suggestions, and auto-folder naming

Google’s Pixel Launcher may not have as many features as third-party alternatives like Lawnchair, Nova Launcher, or Action Launcher, but its simplicity and clean design have earned it many fans. The launcher comes pre-installed on Google Pixel devices and only rarely receives updates. We generally see new features come to the launcher when Google releases a new Pixel device or major Android update, but the first Android 11 Developer Preview didn’t bring any new Pixel Launcher features with it. However, we know Google has been working on the launcher since we spotted hints at a new “hotseat” feature. Now, XDA Senior Member paphonb, one of the developers on the Lawnchair team and a veteran Pixel Launcher modder, has discovered several other new features that could be coming to Google’s launcher app.

Paphonb modified the latest Pixel Launcher build from the Android 11 Developer Preview in order to surface several in-development features. These features include new actions in the recent apps overview, the ability to hide individual app suggestions in the app drawer, and automatic naming of newly created folders.

New Actions in Recent Apps Overview

In Android 9 Pie, Google moved the code for the recent apps handler from SystemUI to Launcher3, which is the stock AOSP launcher. In the process, Google also introduced higher-quality recent app overview cards that scrolled horizontally, a service that allows the user to select text and images from overview cards (on Pixel devices only), and a service that surfaces a row of suggested apps underneath the overview card.

Now in Android 11, Google is testing replacing the app suggestion row in the recent apps overview with a set of 3 actions. These actions include “select,” “screenshot,” and “share.” The “select” button wasn’t functional for paphonb, but we can guess what it does. It likely highlights all text and images that can be selected in the overview card. As for the other two buttons, the screenshot button captures an image of the app that’s in focus, while the share button captures a screenshot then opens the share menu so you can quickly share it.

Pixel Launcher recent apps overview test in Android 11 DP1

Screenshot by paphonb

Hiding Individual App Suggestions

Google’s row of suggested apps is based on the recent apps that you have most frequently opened. While it’s possible to hide this row entirely by going to the Suggestions submenu in the Pixel Launcher settings, it isn’t possible to stop certain apps from showing up in this row. That could change soon, however. Paphonb shared a screenshot showing a new “don’t suggest app” action when long-pressing the icon of any app in the suggested app row. This action currently doesn’t work, but it’s clear what it would do.

Pixel Launcher in Android 11 Hide App Suggestions

Screenshot by paphonb

Automatically Naming Folders

The Pixel Launcher may soon be able to automatically provide a name for newly created folders that you make by dragging and dropping one app icon onto another. Currently, you can manually name folders by tapping on the “unnamed” text at the bottom of the folder, but Google may save you a bit of effort by detecting what kind of apps you’re grouping together. For example, in the video below, paphonb demonstrated the Pixel Launcher automatically naming a newly created folder “Communication” when he grouped Messages and Gmail together. He also showed it naming a newly created folder as “Social” when he put Telegram and Facebook together.

We don’t know exactly how the Pixel Launcher is determining what kind of applications the user has grouped together, but it’s likely that Google is using a long list of names and types of the most popular apps on the Play Store.

These features are not yet available for users in the latest Pixel Launcher release, and it’s possible that Google may never release them. You can look forward to features like these in modified versions of Google’s launcher, though. If Google does decide to enable any of these features in a future update, we’ll let you know. You can follow our latest posts on the Android 11 release through the following link:

Android 11 News on XDA

The post Pixel Launcher in Android 11 tests new actions in recent apps overview, hiding individual app suggestions, and auto-folder naming appeared first on xda-developers.



from xda-developers https://ift.tt/32ru6ST
via IFTTT